What Market Volatility Really Looks Like
One of the most persistent misconceptions in investing is that a healthy market should feel calm most of the time. In reality, even strong long-term markets can include sharp pullbacks, unsettling headlines, and stretches where confidence seems to disappear almost overnight. Volatility is not a sign that investing has stopped working. More often, it is part of the price investors pay for participating in long-term growth.
The recent S&P 500 move offers a useful case study. From its February 26, 2026 close of 6,908.86 to its March 30, 2026 close of 6,343.75, the index fell about 8.2%. Then, from its March 31, 2026 close of 6,528.65 to its April 17, 2026 close of 7,125.12, it rose about 9.1%. In other words, a decline that felt significant in real time was followed by a recovery that was equally forceful and, for many investors, unexpectedly fast.
The Decline Felt Bigger Than the Number
A market decline does not need to reach bear-market territory to feel deeply uncomfortable. That is especially true when the drop happens quickly and is accompanied by a constant stream of explanations, fears, and forecasts. Reuters reported that the S&P 500 ultimately slid as much as 9% after the late-February conflict shock, stopping just short of the 10% threshold that is commonly used to define a correction. Charles Schwab notes that a correction is generally a decline of more than 10% but less than 20%, which helps explain why this recent episode felt severe even though it narrowly missed that label.
That distinction matters because investors often react to the feeling of volatility more than the category of volatility. An 8% or 9% drawdown still creates doubt, second-guessing, and the temptation to “wait until things settle down.” But markets rarely send an all-clear signal before they begin recovering. By the time the news flow feels comfortable again, much of the rebound may already be underway. That is one reason declines can do more behavioral damage than mathematical damage.
What the Recovery Reminded Investors
The rebound from March 31 through April 17 is a strong reminder that recoveries often begin while the narrative still feels fragile. Reuters noted that by April 15 the S&P 500 had already closed at a fresh record, recovering the losses tied to the conflict-driven selloff. That move happened while risks were still being discussed openly, which is often how recoveries work in practice: markets move ahead of emotional comfort, not after it.
This is why trying to sidestep volatility can be so difficult. Missing the decline sounds appealing, but missing the recovery is often more damaging. The recent sequence compressed both sides of that lesson into a short window: a meaningful decline in roughly a month, followed by a powerful rebound over the next few weeks. For long-term investors, that is less a historical anomaly than a modern example of how quickly sentiment can swing in both directions.
Zooming Out: These Declines Happen More Often Than People Remember
When markets are strong for extended periods, investors can start to think pullbacks are unusual. They are not. Schwab’s research notes that the average maximum drawdown in a calendar year is about 15%, and that declines exceeding 20% have occurred in 14 years of its long-term study set. Fidelity similarly notes that market corrections are a normal part of investing and that the U.S. stock market has historically recovered from every correction, along with milder pullbacks and deeper declines.
That broader context helps frame the last decade more clearly. Counting distinct episodes rather than individual trading days, the S&P 500 has been at least about 8% below its prior all-time high roughly seven times over the last 10 years: the volatility shock in early 2018, the separate late-2018 selloff, the 2020 pandemic bear market, the 2022 bear market, the 2023 correction, the 2025 tariff-driven selloff, and the early-2026 decline. That count is an editorial grouping of distinct drawdown windows, but the point is straightforward: meaningful setbacks have been recurring features of the investing landscape, not rare interruptions.
Why This Pattern Matters for Retirement Investors
For pre-retirees and retirees, volatility is not just an abstract market concept. It affects confidence, spending decisions, and the temptation to become more conservative at exactly the wrong moment. When markets fall, the emotional instinct is often to protect what remains. But when that instinct turns into abandoning a long-term plan, investors can lock in damage that the market itself may have repaired if given enough time.
This is where planning matters more than prediction. A sound retirement strategy does not depend on correctly guessing every drawdown or every rebound. Instead, it recognizes that volatility will happen repeatedly and builds around that reality. That can mean matching portfolio risk to actual cash flow needs, maintaining enough liquidity for near-term spending, and resisting the urge to treat every decline as a signal that the long-term plan has failed.
Start you plan with the GAP analysis in our Retirement Income Guide – Download Here!
The Ten-Year Picture Is Still the Bigger Story
Using the S&P 500’s closing level of 2,091.58 on April 22, 2016 and 7,125.12 on April 17, 2026, the index gained about 240.7% over that stretch, which works out to roughly 13.0% annualized. That is a price-return view based on index levels, so it excludes dividends. Federal Reserve Economic Data also notes that its S&P 500 series is a price index and does not include dividends, which is important context whenever long-term return figures are discussed.
That does not mean the path was smooth. It was not. The last decade included trade-war turbulence, a pandemic bear market, inflation shocks, rapid rate hikes, regional-bank stress, geopolitical conflict, and multiple pullbacks that felt, in the moment, like they might become something worse. Yet the longer-term outcome still rewarded disciplined investors who stayed invested through the discomfort. That is the broader lesson market volatility tends to hide when we focus too closely on the latest decline.
What Investors Can Take From This
The recent decline and recovery offer a useful perspective shift. First, declines are normal, even in otherwise healthy markets. Second, recoveries often begin before confidence returns. Third, long-term returns are built not by avoiding every setback, but by having a plan strong enough to live through them. Those ideas may sound simple, but they are often hardest to remember when volatility is highest.
For retirement investors, that perspective can be especially valuable. The objective is not to become indifferent to market volatility. It is to understand it well enough that temporary declines do not drive permanent decisions. A portfolio should be designed with the expectation that markets will periodically move backward, sometimes sharply, before moving higher again. Recent weeks have simply given us another clear reminder.
Start you plan with the GAP analysis in our Retirement Income Guide – Download Here!
Closing Thoughts
Volatility is uncomfortable, but it is not unusual. The S&P 500’s decline from late February through late March, followed by its recovery into mid-April, is a timely illustration of how quickly sentiment can deteriorate and how quickly markets can recover. Zooming out makes the lesson even clearer: over the last decade, investors have faced multiple stretches where the market moved materially below prior highs, yet the long-term trend remained powerfully positive.
If this kind of volatility has you thinking differently about your own retirement plan, that is not a bad thing. It may be a good time to review whether your allocation, withdrawal strategy, and risk exposure still match your goals and time horizon. If you’d like to talk through how market volatility fits into your broader retirement picture, a phone conversation is a good place to start.
